tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38048632.post7396765912234723234..comments2024-01-13T08:02:36.141-08:00Comments on vAlmIki rAmAyaNa humanified and humanised: #011 HOW DID Dasaratha take back Kaikeyee's rajya shulkamybr (alias ybrao a donkey)http://www.blogger.com/profile/13635995478285822763noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38048632.post-75508388385284255412010-12-19T09:36:31.438-08:002010-12-19T09:36:31.438-08:00it is true that there was a practice of kanya shul...it is true that there was a practice of kanya shulkam. dasharatha had said to ashvapati that a son thru marriage to kaikeyi will inherit the kingdom. but you should know the circumstances too. ashvapati had questioned him as to why he wants to marry again especially when he had two other wives. dasharatha had replied that he is marrying because he wants an heir. then the next question of vitahavyanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38048632.post-74852085405828168842009-12-20T08:43:21.495-08:002009-12-20T08:43:21.495-08:00What is the point in quarelling over differing vie...What is the point in quarelling over differing views of readers of Ramayana<br />which is accepted and revered by millions of Hindus, and is more a fiction and legendary than History, as you say.<br />Do you agree that authors tend to exagerate the good qualities about their Heros and Heroins for emulation. <br />Everyone has both good and bad. One is called GOOD, if the good in him is more than Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38048632.post-82502715402084969362008-04-08T00:47:00.000-07:002008-04-08T00:47:00.000-07:00Pl. quote the relevant verse from Valmiki Ramayana...Pl. quote the relevant verse from Valmiki Ramayana for Asvapati's condition. <BR/><BR/> Reference to a groom's dowry is to compare it to rajya shulkam. No hurt intended against you. It seems u are hurt when a reference is made to dowry which is very common in Indian society. It seems that you had taken your dowry and hence were hurt. I unconditionally tender my apologies to you. I also feelybr (alias ybrao a donkey)https://www.blogger.com/profile/13635995478285822763noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38048632.post-80341109649434420022008-04-07T07:10:00.000-07:002008-04-07T07:10:00.000-07:00yes u are full of lies! ashwapati agrees to give h...yes u are full of lies! ashwapati agrees to give his daughter kaikeye in marriage only if her son is allowed to rule. since she's not able to give him a son without putrakamesti the promise doesn't hold true. dont advise me on studying ayodhya kanda i have read ramayana n number of times.<BR/><BR/>what point u've raised is mnot raised by either by aswapati or kaikeye even manthara doesn't raise Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38048632.post-71964237056153358392008-04-06T12:13:00.000-07:002008-04-06T12:13:00.000-07:00You claim to be a lawyer? i don't think u've passe...You claim to be a lawyer? i don't think u've passed the law exam LOL!!<BR/> We do not know the condition how this promise was extracted ...whatever. we surely know that Dasharatha married Kaikeye enchanted by her beauty n that she could bear an heir for his kingdom, however in due course of time she too couldn't do so and Dasharatha had to resort to 'putrakanesti' so how is kaikeyi special?? Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com